The APO Center of Excellence on Public Sector Productivity
Philippine Standard Time:
Category: Public order and safety
Last 13 August 2021, the COE-PSP Knowledge Center ran a webinar on Knowledge Management in the new normal context, featuring Jon Del Rosario, supervising fellow and professor of Knowledge Management and Quality Management of DAP Graduate School of Public and Development Management, and Dr. Enrique Tayag, director of the Department of Health’s Knowledge Management and Information Technology Service.
Below is a summary and analysis of the responses gathered from the post-webinar survey, highlighting the discussion on the participant’s demographic profile and the results of the knowledge management assessment.
Last 15-17 September 2021, the COE-PSP Knowledge Center ran a webinar on Innovative Thinking for Enhancing Public Sector Productivity, featuring innovation champions, Adrian Ramirez, Leanne Lozanes, Anita S. Gubalane, and Paul Vincent Avecilla.
Below is a summary and analysis of the responses gathered from the post-webinar survey, highlighting the discussion on the participant’s demographic profile and results of the assessment.
Abstract:
The productivity figures presented in Public Service Output, Inputs and Productivity: Education (ONS 2009) are best estimates using the most recently available data. This supporting article presents further detail on the components of output:
Section 2 reports demographic patterns over recent history
Section 3 provides extended analyses of quantity by country
Section 4 provides extended analyses of quality by country
Section 5 provides extended analyses of output by country
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has published periodic assessments of the productivity performance of key public services. This article presents estimates for all public services collectively for the first time since the 2003 ONS article Understanding Government Output and Productivity (Pritchard, 2003).
The purpose of this paper is to highlight the recent lessons from Australasian police agencies’ use of activity measurement. These lessons will allow police agencies to learn from one another, and will assist other government services for which activity measurement may be relevant. The emphasis is on design and implementation issues, as well as how the results can be used to improve internal management and external reporting.
Created by the cross-practice ID4D Working Group as a global data set to present the institutional arrangements, practices, and systems for civil registration and identification, e-ID, e-Passport, and business registries in 198 economies. The dataset was released in April 2015, as a part of ID4D stocktaking exercise (in spreadsheet format; including metadata and statistics worksheets). Current status of government practices are measured through 12 indicators that are updated annually.
