The APO Center of Excellence on Public Sector Productivity
Philippine Standard Time:
Category: Non-tertiary education
The DAP, as the focal organization for the Asian Productivity Organization’s Center of Excellence on Public-Sector Productivity, curates and transforms datasets to bring insights into the public-sector profile of APO member economies. This edition focuses on examining the public sector of Taiwan.
Based on the Bertelsmann Transformation Index Country Report 2024, the public sector of Taiwan exhibited a high degree of stability and functionality, characterized by robust democratic institutions. Taiwan’s government demonstrated resilience and effectiveness in managing various challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
As we continue to curate and transform datasets from reputable sources to bring insights into the public-sector profile of APO member economies, our focus now turns to examining the public sector of Malaysia. Admitted to the organization in 1983, Malaysia aims to meet the growing public expectations by adapting to population dynamics and technology trends. Based on the Ministry of Economy’s Eleventh Malaysia Plan, the government focuses on a citizen-centric approach to enhance public sector productivity through a whole-of-government strategy, emphasizing competent talent, effective project delivery, and efficient services, thus facilitating the country’s transition to an advanced economy and inclusive nation. For your feedback and suggestions: https://bit.ly/DAP-CSM
The DAP, as the APO’s COE-PSP, curates and transforms datasets from various sources to bring dynamic insights into the public-sector profile of APO member economies. In this edition, we look into the profile of Singapore’s public sector. Admitted to the organization in 1969, Singapore boasts a public sector committed to excellence, efficiency, and inclusivity. The government’s strategic planning and continuous efforts to enhance services contribute to the country’s reputation as a well-governed city-state.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Bangladesh.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Fiji.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in India.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Japan.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Korea.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Mongolia.
In 2020, the COE-PSP studied the public sector profiles of various countries in Asia and the Pacific Region. The factsheet below presents selected relevant data and information about public sector productivity and innovation in Singapore.
